PDA

View Full Version : wf vs. dt



tfucini
04-23-2007, 05:56 PM
is there really any difference between wheight forward and double taper other than you can flip double taper around and use it the other way? do they both mend, cast, act the same otherwhise?

Todd K
04-23-2007, 08:31 PM
Double taper roll cast better if you have no room for a back cast. Double tapers aren't always equal on both ends. I found that out for myself.:) I started out using WF lines, and have now switched many of my everyday lines to DT.

tfucini
04-23-2007, 09:04 PM
hows the orvis wonderline generation 3 trout DT? i saw on the site it is only 39$ on sale for the DT and its still 59 for the WF soo thats y i ask this ?

The Patriot
04-23-2007, 11:15 PM
I prefer DT lines, particularly for dry fly lines. I have a line specifically tapered for nymphing (don't ask me why I bothered, I suck at nymphing and hate it), which is definitely weight forward.

DT is definitely better for roll casting and dry fly presentations. Plus you can turn it around and use the other end.... theoretically.

The advantage for weight forward is in turning over bigger flies, weighted flies, nymphing rigs with bobbers, I mean "indicators", split shot, and multiple flies. Also, weight forward is generally regarded as the better "beginner" line, since it is easier to load the rod and cast.... theoretically. And a WF line will load the rod with less line out than a DT, so it can also be a plus in short range casting..... theoretically.

For the money, the DT is a good buy. But again, the trade off is wether or not you would benefit from a weight forward line as a beginner. See if you can find someone who has a DT line and compare casting it with casting a WF and see if you're comfortable casting a DT.

tfucini
04-24-2007, 07:01 AM
all ive used soo far is WF... my first rod came with it.. and the when i tried out all of my buddies dads rods all he uses is the orvis WF... soo thats y i figured i would ask... as for short range casting, the rod i am looking to get line (backing, reel, ect) for is a 6'6" 3wt rod soo it will be used for going to some tight places

tfucini
04-25-2007, 11:32 AM
yup.. i went with the orvis wonderline 3 trout taper DT 3wt.... mainly because it was on sale for 39 bux :) thank god they had it in olive dun... because other wise i would of spent the extra 20 dollars for the WF just to now have the bright neon yellow haha

Dr. Gonzo
11-18-2008, 06:27 AM
I am a beginner and I use Orvis Wonderline Gen 3 DT on my 5wt and love it. It took a little adjusting to but I find that there's really no difference in how the rod loads and it has just as much range in distance casting as my WF line. I've used it with nymph setups with split shot and strike indicators without a hitch. I find that it lands more softly on the water and is better for roll casting. I think it's all a matter of preference, but I would recommend it to anyone.

dudley
11-18-2008, 08:02 AM
For the most part, the taper of a DT and a WF are exactly the same for the first 30 feet (or so) of the line
If you're casting 30' or less, you'll not be able to detect any difference.

Once you get past that point is where the difference lies
The thicker belly of the DT helps with mending and roll casting, while the heavier head of the WF works for better distance